Hello Viktor, thanks for the pointers. Please note that upstream development of courier and the Debian packaging for courier are somewhat different projects. You're mostly mentioning upstream work and issues. I guess upstream needs to decide how they want to work. For the Debian packaging, it's certainly going to be the Debian BTS for bug reporting, as it's tightly integrated with all of the existing Debian infrastructure. But I'm subscribed to the relevant courier-* mailing lists [0] and I'll have a look at the bugs and patches you mentioned. Don't expect me to do feature development for courier, though. Kind Regards Markus Wanner [0]: Please note that I'm subscribed to lots of mailing lists, but I'm certainly not reading all of it. Therefore, please CC me for a heads-up. On 03/23/2017 09:59 PM, SZÉPE Viktor wrote: > Would it be possible to enable very easy bug reporting? > I have two here: https://github.com/szepeviktor/courier/issues > > I think discussion in a Debian bug report is quiet hard. > On GitHub it is very easy to contribute. > > Sam merged a lot of Debian patches as you may know. > https://github.com/szepeviktor/courier/commit/bca5316f40bf9335c9ec36db850916481e99cd2c > > And we have final break-through with CNAMEs (Amazon SES, Mailjet etc.) > https://github.com/svarshavchik/courier-libs/commit/5e522ab14f45c6f4f43c43e32a2f72fbf6354f1c > > > And you can read on courier-users that many are willing to contribute. > > All the best to you! > > > SZÉPE Viktor > https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/blob/master/CV.md
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature