On Fri, 2017-03-17 at 21:58 +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: > Sorry forgot to mention my plan. > Currently we have some libomxil-bellago* in Debian. > I plan to package gst-omx by using update-alternatives on > libgstomx.so and /etc/xdg/gstomx.conf on different configs. Bellagio is a rather useless OpenMAX implementation and for all the codecs it provides (which are software based), there are better native GStreamer plugins available. > So my plan is to have the following binary packages: > * gstreamer1.0-omx-generic: contains libgstomx-generic.so (build > with > generic target) and with the lowest priority for libgstomx.so > * gstreamer1.0-omx-generic-bin: usr/bin/listcomponents (I think we > don't need to alternate this right? as it only reads the component > names > of openmax IL). I wouldn't install that one, it's more a debugging tool and also probably should be renamed to gst-omx-listcomponents instead otherwise. Maybe put it into /usr/doc :) > * gstreamer1.0-omx-generic-config: contains > /etc/xdg/gstomx-generic.conf which is an empty config and provides > /etc/xdg/gstomx.conf with lowest priority. > * gstreamer1.0-omx-bellagio: contains libgstomx-bellagio.so (build > with > bellagoi target) and with the mid priority for libgstomx.so. This > package will be set priority: extra. > * gstreamer1.0-omx-bellagio-config: contains > /etc/xdg/gstomx-bellagio.conf modify with current Debian > libomxil-bellagio path. And provides /etc/xdg/gstomx.conf with mid > priority. This package will be set priority: extra. > > Do you think this is good? > I tried to build RPi but it needs to Build-Depends on proprietary > headers so I'm not going to build it. > > For RPi they can use update-alternatives to override libgstomx.so. > > Please give me more comments if this is possible. Thank you very > much. Generally this approach seems sensible. You make a generic package and then have update-alternatives for selecting between the different ones. The main problem here is that on a generic system you don't have any useful OpenMAX IL implementation. Bellagio is not useful. So only specific variants for different hardware devices would seem useful. I guess on ARM you could make a generic build, for many OpenMAX IL implementations only a configuration file is needed and not a custom build. Hope this helps somehow :) I'm not sure what the best to do here is, that's why I didn't consider packaging it myself. IMHO that's the job of whoever does the distribution for a specific piece of hardware. Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part