[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#618548: marked as done (RFP: ricoh-kernel -- Drivers for recent ricoh card readers (SD/MMC/MS))

Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:20:07 +0000
with message-id <E1ch7MV-0007nz-Kf@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: ricoh-kernel -- Drivers for recent ricoh card readers (SD/MMC/MS)
has caused the Debian Bug report #618548,
regarding RFP: ricoh-kernel -- Drivers for recent ricoh card readers (SD/MMC/MS)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
618548: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618548
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: ricoh-kernel
Version: WNPP
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

The ricoh-kernel (r5c822/832 card reader) project is not a part of the trunk
kernel tree and it would be interesting to have it as ready to build package
(with dkms, for example).

It can help for laptop card reader compatibility particularly for memory stick
support !

Sources are available here : http://gitorious.org/ricoh-kernel

Could your consider to study packaging and integration of that driver ?

Best regards

Mourad



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 618548 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: