Bug#850590: RFS: openmeca/2.1.5-1 [ITP: #850590]
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:11:53AM +0100, dada wrote:
>
> Le 2017-01-27 09:28, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> >thanks for preparing openmeca. Here are some remarks:
> > d/changelog:
> > - you created several sections all featuring your name
> > that's not sensible in general
> > - a changelog for the first upload should not contain more
> > than "Initial release. (Closes: #850590)"
> that's done
OK, I've removed the last remaining redundant instance.
I also reverted the commit that was injecting a patched version.
Please make sure you do
quilt pop -a
before commiting.
> > d/control:
> > - per policy you should use "Priority: optional"
> > - please normalise via
> > cme fix dpkg-control
> that's done
Fine.
> > - do you have good reasons to specify lib* instead of just
> > trusting ${shlibs:Depends} ?
> You right, these libs were removed rom dependencies
OK.
> >BTW, you can use debhelper compat level 10 (d/compat) and
> >Build-Depend debhelper (>= 10).
> that's done, (I was confusing between debian stable and debian testing
> realease)
There might be good reasons for sticking to debhelper 9 but a backport
to stable would not be such good reason since debhelper 10 is backported
as well.
> >Please fix these issues and I'll try a build (if nobody will
> >beat me with sponsering which is always welcome ;-)).
>
> Thank you very much for your reviewing and your help,
You are welcome. Please also add pristine-tar branch to the repository.
Policy recommends to do
gbp import-orig --pristine-tar YOUR_TARBALL
which keeps metadata about the tarball in a pristine-tar branch.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: