Bug#852762: marked as done (ITP: node-cli-spinners -- Spinners for use in the terminal)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jan 2017 16:41:32 +0200
with message-id <20170128144132.poljl37bttw546sm@localhost>
and subject line node-cli-spinners is already in Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #852762,
regarding ITP: node-cli-spinners -- Spinners for use in the terminal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
852762: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852762
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tushar Agey <agey.tushar3@gmail.com>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : node-cli-spinners
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus <sindresorhus@gmail.com> (sindresorhus.com)
* URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/cli-spinners#readme
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : Spinners for use in the terminal
This script can generate various interesting spinners
to use in terminal. Spinners are various graphical small
objects like arrows, right check,
wrong cross, dots, etc
.
Node.js is an event-based server-side JavaScript engine.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
node-cli-spinners is already in Debian:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-cli-spinners
It is currently only in experimental, please talk to the maintainer
(added in Cc) in case you require the package in unstable.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--- End Message ---
Reply to: