Bug#639910: Packaging sbt
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 23:16:52 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> wrote:
> Le 18/11/2016 à 14:41, Frederic Bonnard a écrit :
>
> Hi Frederic,
>
> > There is much work to finalize this if that is ok, but indeed, before
> > continuing I'd like to know if I'm on the good path.
>
> This looks like a valid approach. Did you use Scala 2.10 or 2.11 for
> compiling SBT?
I used scala 2.11 as it's the one available in unstable.
> If you have a working SBT package I suggest uploading it
> now to experimental/non-free, this will enable others to jump in and
> help with the dependencies.
Well, that's where I'm unsure.
I packaged in a functional manner all the sbt components I listed above,
meaning, that it would need further work (on control/copyright/...etc files).
This was a POC and functionally speaking, that seems to work.
Now if the approach I followed is valid according to Debian policy, I'll
do things properly to push sbt and that minimal set of dependencies in experimental.
I don't think it would be ok to do a binary upload. My idea was to do a
full clean source upload, right ?
If so, I'll focus on the coming days/weeks to provide all this.
F.
Reply to: