Bug#846633: ITP: iterum -- Iterum is a multiprotocol chat bot
Now the bug report
----- Forwarded message from Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> -----
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 14:01:10 +0100
From: Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#846633: ITP: iterum -- Iterum is a multiprotocol chat bot
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:03:07PM +0200, Kyle Robbertze wrote:
> Package: wnpp
>
> * Package name : iterum
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Kyle Robbertze <krobbertze@gmail.com>
> * URL : http://iterum.io/
> * License : MIT/X/Expat
> Programming Lang: Python
> Description : Iterum is a multi-protocol chat bot
>
> Development on ibid seems to have stalled and myself and
> a few others decided to fork it and continue development.
Please learn from that.
Make it possible that over some years other people
take takeover development / maintenance of "iterum".
> I plan on maintaining it within the PAPT. I will need a
> sponsor.
I don't know what PAPT is. I did found https://launchpad.net/iterum
Also http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~iterum-core/iterum/trunk/files/head:/docs/
I think it would be good to have the .rst files
rendered into .html somewhere on-line.
Other thing I couldn't find: the "debian directory"
Groeten
Geert Stappers
DD
--
Leven en laten leven
----- End forwarded message -----
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 06:58:24PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 02:01:10PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > I plan on maintaining it within the PAPT. I will need a
> > > sponsor.
> >
> > I don't know what PAPT is.
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonAppsPackagingTeam
Thanks
> > Other thing I couldn't find: the "debian directory"
> That's probably fine for a package that doesn't exist yet.
* URL : http://iterum.io/
says allready:
| Debian Package
|
| Install from your package repository
| sudo apt install iterum
So a "debian directory" might allready exist.
It is what a sponsor would look for.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Leven en laten leven
Reply to: