[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#846366: ITP: bcc -- Command line tools for BPF Compiler Collection (BCC)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi Sebastien,

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 08:25 +0100, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> Hi Ritesh,
> 
> I agree with you, there is no reason we can't coexist :)
> 
> However, perf-tools-unstable doesn't seem to be much more updated these
> days, and it sorta worries me, especially since Brendan Gregg mentions
> on his blog that bcc seems to be the future: in that light, do you still
> see a need for perf-tools-unstable at all ?
> 

Yes. I saw that too. Maybe you'd want to check with him first. If there are no
plans on maintaining it, then perhaps we should discontinue it.
I'd be surprised though, given his tools rely on ftrace, that he'd want to
discontinue them.

> If you do, would you be willing to take over its maintainership ? I'm
> trying to save more time to contribute to security work in Debian, so
> you'd be welcome to do that :)
> 

Yes. I can do that. But please, first lets start an email with Brendan (please
CC me too) and clarify on perf-tools-unstable's roadmap.

> Anyway, let me know what you think and we'll take it from there.

For now, I'll just mark perf-tools-unstable as a conflict against this package.
Later, once we've concluded with upstream, we can decide on renaming, or maybe
even merging both sources together, into a single package name.


- -- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=FMuo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: