[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#608317: marked as done (RFP: python-mahotas -- Efficient Image Processing Library for Python)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2016 22:20:30 +0000
with message-id <E1bi7gM-0006Fw-46@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: python-mahotas -- Efficient Image Processing Library for Python
has caused the Debian Bug report #608317,
regarding RFP: python-mahotas -- Efficient Image Processing Library for Python
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
608317: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608317
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luis Pedro Coelho <luis@luispedro.org>


I am proposing to package mahotas, which was created by me.

* Package name    : python-mahotas
  Version         : 0.6.2
  Upstream Author : Luis Pedro Coelho <luis@luispedro.org>
* URL             : http://packages.python.org/mahotas/
* License         : (GPL)
  Programming Lang: (C++, Python)
  Description     : Efficient Image Processing Library for Python

It includes  algorithms implemented in C++ for speed while operating in numpy
arrays.

Notable algorithms:
- watershed.
- SURF features
- hit & miss. thinning.
- Zernike & Haralick features.
- freeimage based numpy image loading.
- thresholding.
- convex points calculations.
- morphological functions.

Currently, the package has no known bugs. In the past, reported bugs have been
fixed in 24 hours or, most often, less.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 608317 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: