[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#605577: marked as done (RFP: usher -- A dispatcher for multiple monotone servers or databases)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2016 22:20:27 +0000
with message-id <E1bi7gJ-00069K-3w@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: usher -- A dispatcher for multiple monotone servers or databases
has caused the Debian Bug report #605577,
regarding RFP: usher -- A dispatcher for multiple monotone servers or databases
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
605577: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605577
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Richard Levitte <levitte@lapdog.home.levitte.org>


* Package name    : usher
  Version         : 1.0
  Upstream Author : Timothy Brownawell <tbrownaw@gmail.com>
* URL             : http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/
* License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: C++, sh
  Description     : A dispatcher for multiple monotone servers or databases

 As your collection of projects kept with monotone grows, you may need
 to create separate databases, separate permissions, and perhaps also
 distribute them over several computers.  Usher provides an interface
 that dispatches monotone network calls based on server/project names,
 host names or branch prefixes, control over the different underlying
 monotone servers, and the possibility to add and remove underlying
 monotone servers in run-time.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 605577 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: