[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#492264: marked as done (RFP: libnb-svnclientadapter-java -- High-level Java API to subversion)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2016 22:20:26 +0000
with message-id <E1bi7gI-00067q-1Q@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: libnb-svnclientadapter-java -- High-level Java API to subversion
has caused the Debian Bug report #492264,
regarding RFP: libnb-svnclientadapter-java -- High-level Java API to subversion
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
492264: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492264
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yulia Novozhilova <Yulia.Novozhilova@sun.com>

* Package name    : libnb-svnclientadapter-java
Version         : 6.0.1
Upstream Author : Original SvnClientAdapter code: Mark Phippard and others.
See
 http://subclipse.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectMemberList and
 http://www.ohloh.net/projects/4137/contributors?page=1.

 NetBeans fork: Tomas Stupka, Petr Kuzel, Maros Sandor.
* URL : http://subversion.netbeans.org/teepee/svnclientadapter.html 
* License         : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description     : High-level Java API to subversion

That is why svnClientAdapter is easier to use in many cases.
For example, you can use ISVNClientAdapter addToIgnoredPatterns method
to add a pattern of files to ignore to a directory.
This is a NetBeans forked version of SvnClientAdapter.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 492264 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: