On Tuesday, September 06 2016, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:35:06AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Yes, I use the upstream name as part of the package name. In this case, >> the upstream is At.js, so the package name becomes libjs-jquery-at.js. > > It might be advisable (for someone looking to fulfill this RFP) to keep > the .js in the source package name but remove it from the binary package > name. Then someone looking to install or depend on the package doesn't > have to keep track of which of the upstreams like to include the '.js' > suffix. I guess this is up to the packager/maintainer. I myself prefer to include the .js suffix in order to be as close as possible from upstream. My rationale is that someone who wants to include this library as a dependency will either look for the upstream package name, or look for some substring that is part of the upstream package name. But either way, I guess this depends on the preference of the maintainer. -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature