Bug#842336: marked as done (ITP: node-fragment-cache -- A cache for managing namespaced sub-caches)
Your message dated Sun, 30 Oct 2016 17:00:13 +0000
with message-id <E1c0tSv-000IP0-Hf@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#842336: fixed in node-fragment-cache 0.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #842336,
regarding ITP: node-fragment-cache -- A cache for managing namespaced sub-caches
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
842336: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842336
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : node-fragment-cache
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Jon Schlinkert (https://github.com/jonschlinkert)
* URL : https://github.com/jonschlinkert/fragment-cache
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : A cache for managing namespaced sub-caches
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: node-fragment-cache
Source-Version: 0.2.0-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
node-fragment-cache, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 842336@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> (supplier of updated node-fragment-cache package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 23:32:31 +0530
Source: node-fragment-cache
Binary: node-fragment-cache
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers <pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org>
Description:
node-fragment-cache - Cache for managing namespaced sub-caches
Closes: 842336
Changes:
node-fragment-cache (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial release (Closes: #842336)
Checksums-Sha1:
98f44898e57a1cad3c652e2bbd992f2540059f05 2110 node-fragment-cache_0.2.0-1.dsc
c1a7d3ce3793188665ec2450e292fd282e6c9d19 5955 node-fragment-cache_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
cdcf14c7e375aabab5fd373b45027082e154faac 2024 node-fragment-cache_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
2ebfc69b5c15a6bb70afaca515529d6eefd6cd11 5156 node-fragment-cache_0.2.0-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
fc320c48bc6e09e88f7547e6909fe66ffab5741e830c39cb62fea7a248602ec1 2110 node-fragment-cache_0.2.0-1.dsc
9b6cb99231a08c6e573bc0296a4fb095601bdf03ba8dc3d87a4acd03b0bae0d2 5955 node-fragment-cache_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
ac751f100e9799a456b56aa899c9bee0d1aac377388ec510c6b8fa2b95651629 2024 node-fragment-cache_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
ca94afe41ebc960792e3129c56fd83b4b59d409f651600ba0878df4c879a1f0b 5156 node-fragment-cache_0.2.0-1_all.deb
Files:
c7d91edd8aa3eb799049b748123ecbd7 2110 web optional node-fragment-cache_0.2.0-1.dsc
69762b2ea2ed3a11a5daada6fc50106a 5955 web optional node-fragment-cache_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
aa12afa485a74e03552927cbd82769ac 2024 web optional node-fragment-cache_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
8ac069c954aae3e582d812be8d5a997e 5156 web optional node-fragment-cache_0.2.0-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=vQDh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: