[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#842327: marked as done (ITP: node-tape -- tap-producing test harness for node and browsers)



Your message dated Sat, 29 Oct 2016 00:52:29 +0300
with message-id <20161028215229.e7i744ulxqmkmx6o@bunk.spdns.de>
and subject line I give up trying to merge the node-tape ITPs
has caused the Debian Bug report #842327,
regarding ITP: node-tape -- tap-producing test harness for node and browsers
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
842327: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842327
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lucas de Castro Borges <lucascastroborges@gmail.com>

* Package name    : node-tape
  Version         : 4.6.2
  Upstream Author : James Halliday <mail@substack.net> (http://substack.net)
* URL             : https://github.com/substack/tape
* License         : Expat
  Programming Lang: JavaScript
  Description     : tap-producing test harness for node and browsers

 .
 Node.js is an event-based server-side JavaScript engine.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I give up trying to merge the node-tape ITPs, that seems to be 
nontrivial in the BTS.

Please use #798278 for packaging node-tape.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--- End Message ---

Reply to: