[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#840055: O: wordplay -- anagram generator



Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

The current maintainer of wordplay, Pawel Wiecek <coven@debian.org>,
is apparently not active anymore.  Therefore, I orphan this package now.

Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.

If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.

Some information about this package:

Package: wordplay
Binary: wordplay
Version: 7.22-17.1
Maintainer: Pawel Wiecek <coven@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9)
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.9.8
Format: 1.0
Files:
 4ee0b60bf68957283d5eac05e50bcef0 1625 wordplay_7.22-17.1.dsc
 785f8a6e9410b2634e88f0bceb7e1743 100776 wordplay_7.22.orig.tar.gz
 823958ba568fb3d8ecad1ab2c3951d96 5374 wordplay_7.22-17.1.diff.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 6f9de863cf3595a9dca9a4aae101a5d46f8cb3d9f2d4ff5ced89a403eaa4c24c 1625 wordplay_7.22-17.1.dsc
 2397c43565d3015b9bba0c432d125c8801cc0ec1105b5f1ec2762aeab0b9bc10 100776 wordplay_7.22.orig.tar.gz
 4ddb54493886af6c7475e99d3b0c6164720ca0fb902c62735fe5d4f7ec684def 5374 wordplay_7.22-17.1.diff.gz
Package-List: 
 wordplay deb games optional arch=any
Directory: pool/main/w/wordplay
Priority: source
Section: games

Package: wordplay
Version: 7.22-17.1
Installed-Size: 252
Maintainer: Pawel Wiecek <coven@debian.org>
Architecture: amd64
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3)
Description: anagram generator
Description-md5: 4f5269b9d73078ce04cd99c7349c4b8a
Tag: game::toys, interface::commandline, role::program, scope::utility,
 use::gameplaying, works-with::text
Section: games
Priority: optional
Filename: pool/main/w/wordplay/wordplay_7.22-17.1_amd64.deb
Size: 90466
MD5sum: 8b60d9be27f181ef0c27ef96cc547b45
SHA256: c41b704017a5a4c04ab10fae40d682204a6cd3818e780e6a447bc8d3ee19e11c

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: