[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#809158: marked as done (ITP: gajim-omemo -- Gajim plugin for OMEMO Multi-End Message and Object Encryption)

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:00:12 +0000
with message-id <E1bjvkS-0002YP-8T@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#809158: fixed in gajim-omemo 0.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #809158,
regarding ITP: gajim-omemo -- Gajim plugin for OMEMO Multi-End Message and Object Encryption
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
809158: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809158
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : gajim-plugin-omemo
  Version         : 0.2
  Upstream Author : Bahtiar Gadimov <bahtiar@gadimov.de>
* URL             : https://github.com/kalkin/gajim-omemo
* License         : GPL3+
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : Gajim plugin for OMEMO Multi-End Message and Object Encryption

"This is an experimental plugin that adds support for the OMEMO
Encryption to Gajim.

DO NOT rely on this plugin to protect sensitive information!"

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: gajim-omemo
Source-Version: 0.9-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gajim-omemo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 809158@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
W. Martin Borgert <debacle@debian.org> (supplier of updated gajim-omemo package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:06:08 +0000
Source: gajim-omemo
Binary: gajim-omemo
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: W. Martin Borgert <debacle@debian.org>
Changed-By: W. Martin Borgert <debacle@debian.org>
Description:
 gajim-omemo - Gajim plugin for OMEMO Multi-End Message and Object Encryption
Closes: 809158
Changes:
 gajim-omemo (0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (Closes: #809158)
Checksums-Sha1:
 15134d2280858730807d30e101d339563cf28f0e 1861 gajim-omemo_0.9-1.dsc
 0e7f855b4cf64aae6ac3a9243a510b321aaad3bf 96668 gajim-omemo_0.9.orig.tar.gz
 8024eb415d87df66b1d525f0c57566d8f9556a6a 2644 gajim-omemo_0.9-1.debian.tar.xz
 49b73ba0787e87da26866e7da348118419588cd7 33238 gajim-omemo_0.9-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 c922774cf9dcab0f7de50108078124cc9f722d967c23ec8fe8013a8c984fff04 1861 gajim-omemo_0.9-1.dsc
 06735e2583c22c26df303568971e89d4ad3732217ead0ce93d1cdb8a8d0fc0ca 96668 gajim-omemo_0.9.orig.tar.gz
 8450954347dc1e976da226de73981e0b23d63b69e07527f29297a8a0262c3889 2644 gajim-omemo_0.9-1.debian.tar.xz
 dbe0da1ebdcae3f5a084065d456a210b9e1821cd243630d5311271824364ff29 33238 gajim-omemo_0.9-1_all.deb
Files:
 7514dcb08fb4074c4764f1a77a6f8838 1861 net optional gajim-omemo_0.9-1.dsc
 17ee002355ed83af823b2d86228abd36 96668 net optional gajim-omemo_0.9.orig.tar.gz
 0795604f2ce817b68be2ccf6a454297e 2644 net optional gajim-omemo_0.9-1.debian.tar.xz
 55510bdfcb5643fdafc35d3f18e7c977 33238 net optional gajim-omemo_0.9-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=brte
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: