Bug#584071: marked as done (RFP: monitor-edid -- tool to retrieve monitor EDID information)
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:57:27 +0000
with message-id <E1bYVh1-0005bf-DJ@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: monitor-edid -- tool to retrieve monitor EDID information
has caused the Debian Bug report #584071,
regarding RFP: monitor-edid -- tool to retrieve monitor EDID information
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
584071: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584071
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <mathieu.tl@gmail.com>
* Package name : monitor-edid
Version : svn269700
Upstream Author : Anssi Hannula <anssi@mandriva.org>
* URL : http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Tools/monitor-edid
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: C++, Perl
Description : tool to retrieve monitor EDID information
This tool is used to retrieve EDID information from a monitor using
instrumentation provided by SYSFS, usually through the drm drivers.
EDID information is used to attempt to get a clear representation of
a display's recommended resolution, physical size, form factor, as well
as other useful tidbits of information.
Mathieu Trudel
mathieu.tl@gmail.com
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 584071-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: closing RFP: monitor-edid -- tool to retrieve monitor EDID information
- From: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:57:27 +0000
- Message-id: <E1bYVh1-0005bf-DJ@quantz.debian.org>
RFP 584071 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: