[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#579076: marked as done (RFP: bitfrost -- Python library for BIOS security on the OLPC XO laptop)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:57:43 +0000
with message-id <E1bYVhH-0005yG-Ab@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: bitfrost -- Python library for BIOS security on the OLPC XO laptop
has caused the Debian Bug report #579076,
regarding RFP: bitfrost -- Python library for BIOS security on the OLPC XO laptop
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
579076: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579076
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Package: wnpp
Owner: Luke Faraone <luke@faraone.cc>, Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

* Package name    : bitfrost
  Version         : 1.0.8
  Upstream Author : One Laptop Per Child, Inc.
* URL             : http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Bitfrost
* License         : GPL-2+
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : Python library for BIOS security on the OLPC XO laptop

Bitfrost is the OLPC security platform. This package contains tools to
handle securing the early boot stages of the system running on the XO
laptop.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkvTtDAACgkQtrC51grHAgbIwgCgnfJX1I9MKsZyB7wuaq6W0dwh
PfoAn0QiAI+141O/3OilZutjeW/co4v+
=pwYQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 579076 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: