[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#567010: marked as done (RFP: sadms -- integrate a machine in an Active Directory environment)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:57:23 +0000
with message-id <E1bYVgx-0005WE-Aa@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: sadms -- integrate a machine in an Active Directory environment
has caused the Debian Bug report #567010,
regarding RFP: sadms -- integrate a machine in an Active Directory environment
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
567010: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567010
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gauvain Pocentek <gauvain.pocentek@objectif-libre.com>

* Package name    : sadms
  Version         : 2.0.14
  Upstream Author : Bernard Bou <bbou@ac-toulouse.fr>
* URL             : http://sadms.sourceforge.net/
* License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: Python, Shell
  Description     : integrate a machine in an Active Directory environment

SADMS (Samba as Active Directory Member Server/Station) provides a
graphical tool to ease the integration of a Linux system in a Windows
Active Directory environment.
It manages the configuration of all the needed services:
 * samba/winbind
 * kerberos
 * nss
 * pam
It can also manage remote machines using ssh connections.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 567010 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: