Bug#565533: marked as done (RFP: pywebcheck -- a tool for checking updates of files in a server)
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:57:21 +0000
with message-id <E1bYVgv-0005To-PO@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: pywebcheck -- a tool for checking updates of files in a server
has caused the Debian Bug report #565533,
regarding RFP: pywebcheck -- a tool for checking updates of files in a server
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
565533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565533
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: ITP:pyWebcheck -- a tool for checking updates of files in a server.
- From: Enrico <enrico.trt@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:18:58 +0100
- Message-id: <d96ab2c51001161018q8effb04je9a246329770b6bf@mail.gmail.com>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : pyWebcheck
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Enrico Trotta <enrico.trt@gmail.com>
* URL : https://launchpad.net/pywebcheck
* License : GPL v3
Programming Lang : Python
Description : A tool for checking updates of files in a server.
pyWebcheck is a tool written in python + pygtk, wich helps to know if
some files of a server have been updated, using an FTP connection.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 565533-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: closing RFP: pywebcheck -- a tool for checking updates of files in a server
- From: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:57:21 +0000
- Message-id: <E1bYVgv-0005To-PO@quantz.debian.org>
RFP 565533 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: