[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#560597: marked as done (RFP: libwiki-toolkit-formatter-markdown-perl -- Markdown formatter for Wiki::Toolkit)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:57:42 +0000
with message-id <E1bYVhG-0005x2-4N@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: libwiki-toolkit-formatter-markdown-perl -- Markdown formatter for Wiki::Toolkit
has caused the Debian Bug report #560597,
regarding RFP: libwiki-toolkit-formatter-markdown-perl -- Markdown formatter for Wiki::Toolkit
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
560597: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560597
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : libwiki-toolkit-formatter-markdown-perl
  Version         : 0.0.4
  Upstream Author : Chris Prather <perigrin@cpan.org>
* URL             : http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?Wiki::Toolkit::Formatter::Markdown
* License         : Artistic or GPL-1+
  Programming Lang: Perl
  Description     : Markdown formatter for Wiki::Toolkit.

 A formatter backend for Wiki::Toolkit using Text::Markdown.

Note: I plan to package all Perl modules which are used in conjunction with
Wiki::Toolkit (Formatters, Plugins) and not shipped with this module.

Regards
          Racke

--
LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/
Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration
ICDEVGROUP => http://www.icdevgroup.org/
Interchange Development Team

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 560597 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: