[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#556552: marked as done (RFP: python-openelectrophy -- data analysis framework for intra- and extra-cellular recordings)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:57:28 +0000
with message-id <E1bYVh2-0005cs-8m@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: python-openelectrophy -- data analysis framework for intra- and extra-cellular recordings
has caused the Debian Bug report #556552,
regarding RFP: python-openelectrophy -- data analysis framework for intra- and extra-cellular recordings
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
556552: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556552
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Hanke <michael.hanke@gmail.com>

* Package name    : python-openelectrophy
  Version         : 0.0.svn145
  Upstream Author : Samuel Garcia, Nicolas Fourcaud-Trocmé
* URL             : http://neuralensemble.org/trac/OpenElectrophy
* License         : Cecill v2
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : data analysis framework for intra- and extra-cellular recordings


This package provide a library und GUI for analyzing electrophysiological data.
(imagine the rest of a long description)


There has been some debate whether the Cecill v2 license can be
considered DFSG-compatible [0]. Wikipedia says '?' [1]. It claims to be
GPL-compatible and might allow relicensing under the GPL. If it turns out to
be incompatible, I'll try to talk with upstream about it -- otherwise
the package would target 'non-free'.

The software essentially exposes a 'pyssdh' package, hence the Debian
package might be named python-pyssdh. However, the package also serves
as the 'OpenElectrophy' GUI-application (via python-qt4) and I guess
this is what users would look for. It might be reasonable to add an
additional arch:all binary package 'openelectrophy' that merely contains
the short wrapper script distributed by upstream and a link in /usr/bin
and otherwise depend on python-pyssdh -- not sure yet whether this is
the way to go.

The main (and only) form of distribution is via SVN. It has never been
released the tarball way, hence the made up version.

I am about to add this project to the relevant task pages of the
Debian-Med and -Science pure blends.

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2008/12/msg00045.html
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CeCILL

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 556552 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: