[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#507463: marked as done (RFP: lp-solve-xli-dimacs -- xli_DIMACS plugin for lp-solve)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:57:24 +0000
with message-id <E1bYVgy-0005Yd-Ub@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: lp-solve-xli-dimacs -- xli_DIMACS plugin for lp-solve
has caused the Debian Bug report #507463,
regarding RFP: lp-solve-xli-dimacs -- xli_DIMACS plugin for lp-solve
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
507463: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507463
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: lp-solve
Version: 5.5.0.10-10
Severity: wishlist


The version of lp-solve in Debian is missing a plugin I need. This is the xli_DIMACS plugin. It 
can be obtained from http://lpsolve.sourceforge.net/5.5/distribution.htm.

It would be very nice to have it in Debian.

Greetings,
Kilian. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages lp-solve depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.7-16     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libsuitesparse-3.1.0          3.1.0-3    collection of libraries for comput

lp-solve recommends no packages.

lp-solve suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 507463 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: