[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#515434: marked as done (RFP: lostlabyrinth -- dungeon crawling game)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:56:36 +0000
with message-id <E1bY9Ce-0002C6-IU@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: lostlabyrinth -- dungeon crawling game
has caused the Debian Bug report #515434,
regarding RFP: lostlabyrinth -- dungeon crawling game
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
515434: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515434
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Evgeni Golov <sargentd@die-welt.net>

* Package name    : lostlabyrinth
  Version         : 3.4.4
  Upstream Author : Markus Doebele <mar_doe@gmx.de>
* URL             : http://www.lostlabyrinth.com/
* License         : GPL-2+
  Programming Lang: PureBasic
  Description     : dungeon crawling game

 Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game with the following
 features:
 * Relatively short gameplay (between 10-40 Minutes)
 * Very high replayability because everything is created at random!
 * Many different skills to choose from (every player needs another tactic!)
 * No experience gain for killing monsters (only for reaching new levels!)
 * Zelda like graphics
 * Up to 4 players at the same machine

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 515434 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: