[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#515001: marked as done (RFP: msnshadow -- sniffer and spoofer tool for MSN protocol)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:56:19 +0000
with message-id <E1bY9CN-0001oi-NR@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: msnshadow -- sniffer and spoofer tool for MSN protocol
has caused the Debian Bug report #515001,
regarding RFP: msnshadow -- sniffer and spoofer tool for MSN protocol
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
515001: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515001
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: luciano bello <luciano@debian.org>

* Package name    : msnshadow
  Version         : 0.3-beta
  Upstream Author : Gabriel Menezes Nunes <gabrielmn at users.sourceforge.net>
* URL             : http://sourceforge.net/projects/msnshadow/
* License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description     : Sniffer and spoofer tool for MSN protocol

MSN Shadow is a forensics tool for analysis and digital investigation for the MSN protocol.
This tool can perform several active investigation techniques in Microsoft Notification Protocol.
It has features such as:

-- MSN text sniffing
-- MSN video sniffing
-- Spoofing messages
-- Hijacking Sessions
-- Shutdown users
-- Capture of contact lists
-- Reading of PCAP files
-- Save text sniffed in HTML format
-- Save video sniffed in AVI format
-- Auto detection of video traffic

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 515001 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: