[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#736700: marked as done (O: rant -- Flexible, Ruby based make)



Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:23:24 +0000
with message-id <E1bO6pg-0005ms-3B@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#831393: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #736700,
regarding O: rant -- Flexible, Ruby based make
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
736700: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736700
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

rant is a ruby make tool similar to rake. Perhaps too similar, as rake
was the original (ruby make) implementation. There appears to be little
activity upstream.

I lack the time to maintain it. Family commitments. The modest
development time I have being taken by sisu.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.5.8-8+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package rant has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/831393

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply to: