Agreed. Should I close the ITP then? Best, James On 09/07/2016 1:38 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > * James Lu <bitflip3@gmail.com> [160709 08:37]: >> Many few months ago, me and David prepared an upload of git-up 0.5.12-1, >> which can be found in the Debian Ruby Git repository at >> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-ruby-extras/git-up.git > [..] >> Upstream has not done anything so far to fix the bugs with Git 2.5 >> worktrees: https://github.com/aanand/git-up/pull/100. I'm wondering if >> this is worth including as a patch until it is merged upstream. > > Note that upstream now says: > > | This project is no longer maintained, for several reasons: > | > | * I've stopped using the workflow that made it relevant to me. > | * Git 2.0 updated the default behaviour to remove the main problem it > | was solving (by changing the default behaviour of git push so it > | acts only on the current branch, instead of all branches). > | * Auto-stashing is now supported natively with git rebase --autostash. > > Therefore I'd strongly suggest not uploading this when it's upstream > is already gone. > > Best, >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature