Bug#827293: marked as done (ITP: reprotest -- Build software and check it for reproducibility.)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:00:42 +0000
with message-id <E1bHX5e-0006WU-Hd@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#827293: fixed in reprotest 0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #827293,
regarding ITP: reprotest -- Build software and check it for reproducibility.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
827293: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827293
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ceridwen <ceridwen.debian.bugs+debianbugs@gmail.com>
* Package name : reprotest
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Ceridwen <ceridwen.debian.bugs+debianbugs@gmail.com>
* URL : https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/reprotest.git/
* License : GPL 3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Build software and check it for reproducibility.
reprotest builds the same source code in different environments and
then checks the binaries produced by the builds to see if changing the
environment, without changing the source code, changed the produced
binaries.
reprotest is developed as part of the “reproducible builds” Debian
project. It incorporates some code from autopkgtest, used for a
different purpose.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: reprotest
Source-Version: 0.1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
reprotest, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 827293@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ceridwen <ceridwenv@gmail.com> (supplier of updated reprotest package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 18:05:05 -0400
Source: reprotest
Binary: reprotest
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks <reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ceridwen <ceridwenv@gmail.com>
Description:
reprotest - Build software and check it for reproducibility.
Closes: 827293
Changes:
reprotest (0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #827293)
Checksums-Sha1:
a8cda1f630bd5f8d261391a1a4feca0090e36e47 1662 reprotest_0.1.dsc
9468c8dd2059c8df765a1a2132a3eb02c07a1842 73552 reprotest_0.1.tar.xz
e2ee2edcf0936c5e2e271e66463c17904af2aaec 7340 reprotest_0.1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
d3f0836d9dd0b6ac504840d5c5664f09ec9ce0f63dd891023bfc9c77d3a38f03 1662 reprotest_0.1.dsc
c61b2decaaee5d7c43047efed1db68e1db519644a9428f2f61f35ff371bbc25b 73552 reprotest_0.1.tar.xz
746e2707977d8943be269dc0cdae2ac4c0adc7884f256d6acd06a35202dcc380 7340 reprotest_0.1_all.deb
Files:
3c326c9010c346d043a29118cfd690de 1662 devel optional reprotest_0.1.dsc
c43886f0f90a6d2c7a06af6b33139ddd 73552 devel optional reprotest_0.1.tar.xz
a3788b2c682d9df843460254ba016de1 7340 devel optional reprotest_0.1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=XZkd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: