[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#697477: ITP: ostree



2016-03-20 0:17 GMT+01:00 Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>:
> On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 at 17:37:58 +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>> I would like to help with it and co-maintain the package. Also talked
>> with Alexander Larsson a bit about xdg-app on Debian this FOSDEM.
>
> I've uploaded ostree to experimental NEW, with both of us in Uploaders.
> The packaging repository is in collab-maint:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/ostree.git
> Contributions, changes and co-maintainers welcome.

Awesome, thanks a lot! You did a really great job with integrating
ostree as a package with Debian, I didn't get that far back then when
working on it.
The package currently seems to have vanished from the archive index
pages, I guess it's just a temporary glitch...

>> Regarding packaging teams, I wonder whether it would make sense to
>> start a new team and move related software under that umbrella.
>> Specificallly, putting xdg-app, Limba, AppStream, appstream-glib and
>> ostree together might make sense - right now,I am maintaining most of
>> them in the pkg-packagekit Git repo.
>
> For now I've set the maintainer to the Utopia team because I'm a member
> of that team and not pkg-packagekit, but I'd be happy to hand it over
> to any relevant team, as long as I don't end up made responsible for
> software I don't use.
>
> It would be nice if the git repo could stay in collab-maint if another
> team takes it, rather than requiring special group membership: I'm trying
> out an approach inspired by
> <https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/ending_the_tyranny_of_unix_permissions/>
> for this group of packages.

Sounds good :) My idea would be a new team for bundled-apps, since
there's quite some software belonging into that category... (Maybe
something AppStream would fit in too)
But for now, I think, adding another team just to add another team is
useless if it's just us two working on it, so we can add a new team
when it's actually needed :-)

Thanks again for working on this!

Cheers,
    Matthias

-- 
I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/


Reply to: