Hi, On 02/24/2016 02:47 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >> I plan to maintain this within the DPMT team. > > Isn't PAPT more appropriate in this case? > I was thinking DPMT because it has an API that can be integrated in other apps. Is this a appropriate? My motivation to maintain this within DPMT is my my 0 knowledge of svn so if you think it cannot by included in DPMT (which seems reasonable) I ll probably maintain this in collab-maint until PAPT makes a transition to git as well :P Cheers, Orestis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature