Bug#811030: marked as done (ITP: ruby-appraiser -- simple rubygems subcommand for Gemfile)
Your message dated Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:43 +0000
with message-id <E1aMP9f-0004aG-Ad@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#811030: fixed in ruby-appraiser 0.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #811030,
regarding ITP: ruby-appraiser -- simple rubygems subcommand for Gemfile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
811030: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811030
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Andrew Lee (李健秋)" <ajqlee@debian.org>
* Package name : ruby-appraiser
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Junya Ogura <junyaogura@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/juno/appraiser
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : simple rubygems subcommand for Gemfile
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-appraiser
Source-Version: 0.2.0-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-appraiser, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 811030@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrew Lee (李健秋) <andrew.lee@collabora.co.uk> (supplier of updated ruby-appraiser package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:53:00 +0800
Source: ruby-appraiser
Binary: ruby-appraiser
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andrew Lee (李健秋) <andrew.lee@collabora.co.uk>
Description:
ruby-appraiser - simple rubygems subcommand for Gemfile.
Closes: 811030
Changes:
ruby-appraiser (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release (Closes: #811030)
Checksums-Sha1:
a6e78274f5ef34cf0be7f86b1535552d76e66553 2117 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1.dsc
84db57dd73e19d6784ba732c6508b3740ab119eb 5891 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
93de9dd3ca420c5721595977307d39a1496a8ef0 2424 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
2a41b0eaa2fb415d2c0415794b78454e99a4c0d1 4336 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
d82c04b5121f5cf3cb324fcf98b5bc6abb9a7442cac6e9a3fb3a3ee76f7216a6 2117 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1.dsc
16cb914f45b014f582bc1f857476b6c7552d6e5ab57d6810771f8433716a35a2 5891 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
0070cd093e35d847e7bc21d486dbea3effd8c36fda605d511d7cbee3bc5817f9 2424 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
e15e28fcd656f409138a974edd773c0a7aeb5d2180050082f6b09b7c55159223 4336 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1_all.deb
Files:
5b11be9cd947a96896fb58b129d7428d 2117 ruby optional ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1.dsc
25e0e8a183a0ecd86b6226c98321c12d 5891 ruby optional ruby-appraiser_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
371607e2687de2b43507102a2cd50c58 2424 ruby optional ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
7e96e47f7fe1d75cd7e11294e5853ce3 4336 ruby optional ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=bYxF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: