[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#605090: [RFC] Proposal for a new linux-grsec source package



On sam., 2015-11-07 at 14:54 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 1. linux-grsec-{source,support} are included in debian/control but not
> built by debian/rules.real.  I think these should be built; the latter
> will be needed to build metapackages as in linux-latest.
> 
> 
> 3. The changes to gencontrol.py and rules.real to disable most arch:all
> packages should depend on configuration, not the source package name.
> They would then be acceptable for inclusion on the master branch.
> 
So following your patch, I've pushed a split-docs [1] branch on my git
repository implenting this

I used the section name [docs] with enabled: true by default, and I used
DO_DOCS environment variable to pass the information from rules.gen to
rules.real (like FOREIGN_KERNEL case for example), I hope that's the right
thing to do.

I guess I could also call the env var SKIP_DOCS with the opposite logic if you
prefer (at that point it's really bikeshedding I guess).

I /think/ those two patches should be acceptable for inclusion.

Regards,

[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/linux-grsec.git/log/?h=split-
docs
-- 
Yves-Alexis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: