On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 07:24:31 +0100 Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > > On 13/06/2015 14:58, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > I see that there's very recent activity on the repository. > > Does this mean that you are back to work on visit packaging?!? > > That would be really really great news, and should perhaps be publicly > > announced with a new RFP→ITP bug conversion... :-) > > I really hope you can confirm this. > > Yes. I plan to get visit into Stretch, as it is a requirement for the > UV-CDAT analysis package, > which is one of my main goals for stretch. This is really wonderful news! :-) Thanks a lot for confirming. Please don't forget to change back the RFP bug report to an ITP one, when you feel it's time to do so. > > The main blocker for jessie was VTK6, which I think is (nearly?) > resolved. Visit depends on VTK6 Debian jessie has vtk6/6.1.0+dfsg2-6, are you waiting for something that is fixed in vtk6/6.2.0+dfsg1-1 (currently in NEW)? [...] > > P.S.: You replied to me privately: is there any special reason? I think > > that the URI for the git repository should be disclosed to the public > > on the RFP bug log... Could you please reply to the bug address, or, > > alternatively, authorize me to forward your reply there? > > Thanks! > It was not meant to be private, so i've CC'd the bug address. That's great: many thanks! Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpoCnrN5HdW_.pgp
Description: PGP signature