[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#775456: ITP: sankore -- interactive whiteboard interface



Hi,

> 2015-01-15 21:41 GMT+01:00 David Prévot <taffit@debian.org>:
> > Package: wnpp
[…]
> > * Package name    : sankore

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:04:49AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> Maybe you might want to have a look at https://bugs.debian.org/673322

Thanks Miriam, I indeed missed it since it had been renamed a year ago.
You still own that ITP, are you still working on or interested in this
package (based on any upstream fork of Open-Sankoré)?


On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:22:16PM +0000, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> I have some packaging work in Git somewhere [2].
[…]
> [2] http://code.it-zukunft-schule.de/gitweb?p=sankore.git;a=summary

Great, is it possible to check it out without any SSH access (or can you
upload it somewhere accessible if it isn’t)?


On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:45:21AM +0100, Andrea Colangelo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > Then there was this openboard fork which became very promising...
> > and vanished soon again
[…]
> It looked a really promising project, then […] the work stopped.

I guess I should “bts forcemerge 775456 673322” since openboard is again
out of the picture, but I don’t want to steal ownership of the bug
report without Miriam permission first.


On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:11:08PM +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> I am enthusiastic about your ITP. If I can help, please tell me!

Thanks, do not hesitate to apply into Debian Edu team membership on
Alioth, where I initially intend to share the packaging work (I’m of
course open to other ideas), if you’re not already there. I’d like to
recycle as much work as possible from the initial intent by Miriam and
Mike, and rebase it on the latest upstream version, then we may share
the various packaging bits (license checking, code patching for
DFSG-compliance, make it actually buildable and usable, test it, etc.)

Regards

David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: