[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#774744: ITP: obs -- Open Broadcast Software



The frontend is called "obs-studio", though it contains a library called libobs0, thus I felt calling the source package obs-studio a bit wrong.
At the moment, the binary packages would be obs-studio, obs-plugins, libobs0, libobs-dev, and libobs0-dbg.

But true, the source package though could be renamed to obsproject or similar; I'll have to talk to upstream first what they recommend.

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@debian.org> wrote:
Hello,

On 7 January 2015 at 01:57, Carl Fürstenberg <azatoth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Carl Fürstenberg" <azatoth@gmail.com>
>
> * Package name    : obs
>   Version         : 0.7.2
>   Upstream Author : Hugh Bailey <obs.jim@gmail.com>
> * URL             : https://obsproject.com/
> * License         : GPL
>   Programming Lang: C, C++
>   Description     : Open Broadcast Software
>
> a rewrite of what was formerly known as "Open Broadcaster Software",
> software originally designed for recording and streaming live
> video content, efficiently.
>

obs also means "open build service" and we have "obs-build" already
packaged. ( a component of it)

Would you mind using a more verbose name for source & binary packages?
e.g. obsproject or open-broadcast?

--
Regards,

Dimitri.



--
Carl Fürstenberg

Reply to: