[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#809474: marked as done (ITA: syslinux -- collection of boot loaders)



Your message dated Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:18:11 +0800
with message-id <56849E73.4000707@gmail.com>
and subject line close
has caused the Debian Bug report #809474,
regarding ITA: syslinux -- collection of boot loaders
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
809474: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809474
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I intend to adopt this package, that is 'syslinux'.
I usually work under Ubuntu, and an newbie to Debian.
I have much interest to 'kernel', and working on it, this package have
some relation to the kernel, and i will take care of it.

The package description is:
 SYSLINUX is a collection of boot loaders which operates off Linux ext2/3/4 or
 btrfs filesystems, FAT and NTFS filesystems, network servers using PXE
 firmware, or from CD-ROMs.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWhGasAAoJEEORE4mWHkIcva8IAMRf9PdrH/4MR8/72baCjXFt
isOotz5xhvQA4tVddgHQUeepZ+mDiP5P40raq4dpq7oyt5snCjqf6ym/M45C77Pk
wkKqdKmJE6ogC9aXksaoPbZmkDk35077OTOUCo203f0Oi40pjuLI1Xj3U06Mj81R
SkyM/qxLkrhciowryT7eoSk+iOE/p+D8LjauFkagF41vhWAfG5oBAeCn2MpdsYqF
hORWdImmh0TxQXaCoflChyqxE/+K9EzdHPf3wtBrA+stFMUWB0l2CFfc4Su0uHlT
vDGaA1gzWgH6x+TKtDqfDj1G/uPGJni74MPTfGR65N8hInp29y1QiWilz7xEiiE=
=4uaj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 57187

--- End Message ---

Reply to: