Bug#764401: clarity please

[Nicholas Bamber <nicholas@periapt.co.uk>]

I have thought about this comment a little more:


> It is my agreement with David Korn (the ‘k’ in “ksh”) that
> mksh must not be confused for the original, so please refrain
> from doing so.

It seems to me that if a link from ksh to mksh is not an infringement of 
this agreement, then big notices in the mksh man page, package 
description etc that mksh is NOT the original korn shell, would be a 
more appropriate way of adhering to the agreement then leaving mksh/ksh 
interactions in a messed up state.