Bug#697821: ITP: ppsspp -- ppsspp: A portable PSP emulator.

[Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>]

Hi Adrian!



>Adrian, not John.


(my deep apologies for this mistake)
>Why should we switch over to the RFS bug report? What would that change
>and why would there be any double work? I have been in contact with
>Benjamin for a while now and we are just discussing the issues in
>public so that others can follow the progress. I don't really expect
>anyone else to get involved with the package.


well, it is a common practice to set yourself as RFS bug owner, to avoid people
double looking at the same package.

I saw the RFS bug, and not the ITP one, and I was going to review it.

When I review a package sometimes I start by looking at the ITP, sometimes
else I start by looking at the copyright, or the packaging and then the ITP.


I could have started looking at it by mistake e.g. because I didn't follow the "look
at the ITP first" procedure.

>Don't worry, I will take care of the sponsoring. I do regular sponsoring
>as you can see from the sponsor stats.


thanks a lot for the effort :)

so, can I please set yourself as owner of the RFS bug? this way I won't bother you anymore :)
(I didn't find any good way to "look at RFS bugs only where nobody is looking at them", if not
by setting yourself as owner, as described in [1])

[1] http://mentors.debian.net/sponsor/rfs-howto
"If you intend to take care of the sponsoring request until the package is ready for upload, please consider setting yourself as the owner of the bug and tag the bug pending:

$ bts owner nnn me@example.com
$ bts tag nnn +pending "

cheers, and sorry again for the noise!

happy hacking!

Gianfranco