[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#797472: marked as done (ITP: r-cran-hypergeo -- GNU R package providing the Gaussian hypergeometric function for complex numbers)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:24:56 +0200
with message-id <55FEC1B8.7040300@thon.love>
and subject line Bug#797472: ITP: r-cran-hypergeo -- GNU R package providing the Gaussian hypergeometric function for complex numbers
has caused the Debian Bug report #797472,
regarding ITP: r-cran-hypergeo -- GNU R package providing the Gaussian hypergeometric function for complex numbers
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
797472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797472
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonathon <jon@thon.cc>

* Package name    : r-cran-hypergeo
  Version         : 1.2-11
  Upstream Author : Robin K. S. Hankin <hankin.robin@gmail.com>
* URL             : http://cran.r-project.org/package=hypergeo
* License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: R
  Description     : GNU R package providing the Gaussian hypergeometric function for complex numbers

The hypergeo package is a GNU R package providing the Gaussian hypergeometric function for complex numbers.

Packaging by Jonathon Love, under the sponsorship of Andreas Tille

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Tags: fixed

The ITP entry in the changelog of this package was incorrect, and so
this bug was not closed when the package was accepted.

The package has been accepted into unstable, and this bug can be closed.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: