[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#712938: sni-qt -- Indicator support for Qt



I can't compile qt after applying above patch from ubuntu:

til/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:59:8: error: ‘QSystemTrayIconSys’ has not been declared
 Window QSystemTrayIconSys::sysTrayWindow = XNone;
        ^
util/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:60:7: error: ‘QSystemTrayIconSys’ was not declared in this scope
 QList<QSystemTrayIconSys *> QSystemTrayIconSys::trayIcons;
       ^
util/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:60:27: error: template argument 1 is invalid
 QList<QSystemTrayIconSys *> QSystemTrayIconSys::trayIcons;
                           ^
util/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:60:29: error: ‘QSystemTrayIconSys’ has not been declared
 QList<QSystemTrayIconSys *> QSystemTrayIconSys::trayIcons;
                             ^
util/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:60:58: error: invalid type in declaration before ‘;’ token
 QList<QSystemTrayIconSys *> QSystemTrayIconSys::trayIcons;
                                                          ^
util/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:61:31: error: ‘QSystemTrayIconSys’ has not been declared
 QCoreApplication::EventFilter QSystemTrayIconSys::oldEventFilter = 0;
                               ^
util/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:62:6: error: ‘QSystemTrayIconSys’ has not been declared
 Atom QSystemTrayIconSys::sysTraySelection = XNone;
      ^
util/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:63:13: error: ‘QSystemTrayIconSys’ has not been declared
 XVisualInfo QSystemTrayIconSys::sysTrayVisual = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0};
             ^
util/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:66:8: error: ‘QSystemTrayIconSys’ has not been declared
 Window QSystemTrayIconSys::locateSystemTray()
        ^
util/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:78:14: error: ‘QSystemTrayIconSys’ has not been declared
 XVisualInfo* QSystemTrayIconSys::getSysTrayVisualInfo()
              ^
util/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:118:6: error: ‘QSystemTrayIconSys’ has not been declared
 bool QSystemTrayIconSys::sysTrayTracker(void *message, long *result)


Has anybody succeded with that?

Reply to: