[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#792664: ITP: ori -- secure distributed file system



This is very interesting, does Ori have an active developer and user
community?

I would very much like to have orifs on my android phone.

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:03:54AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Afif Elghraoui <afif@ghraoui.name>
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> 
> * Package name    : ori
>   Version         : 0.8.1
>   Upstream Author : Stanford University <orifs-devel@lists.stanford.edu>
> * URL             : http://ori.scs.stanford.edu/
> * License         : ori (MIT-like)
>   Programming Lang: C++
>   Description     : secure distributed file system
> 
> Ori is a distributed file system built for offline operation and empowers
> the user with control over synchronization operations and conflict
> resolution.
> History is provided through lightweight snapshots and users can verify that
> the history has not been tampered with. Through the use of replication,
> instances can be resilient and recover damaged data from other nodes.
> 
> 
> I will need a sponsor for this package. I am currently packaging on
> my local machine using git-build-package and may publish the repository
> on my own git server or seek access on collab-maint.
> 
> --
> Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
> http://afif.ghraoui.name
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 55A8C4FA.8050107@ghraoui.name">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 55A8C4FA.8050107@ghraoui.name
> 

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Troy Benjegerdes                 'da hozer'                  hozer@hozed.org
7 elements      earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soul        grid.coop

      Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,
         nor try buy a hacker who makes money by the megahash


Reply to: