[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#706522: pcs - Pacemaker/Corosync configuration system



On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 11:10 +0100, Martin Gerhard Loschwitz wrote:
> Richard,
> 
> I added you to the HA group on alioth. Let me know if you need something to
> be sponsored. Feel free to do whatever you need with the packages as long
> as you manage to keep them working or make them work again :)
> 
> Best regards
> Martin

Hi Martin,

Thank you so much for your reply. I do want to help out, though I do not
want to step all over your work either :)

I'm very glad to see you are still around and active and willing to
sponsor updates to the packages. I'll work with Feri and contribute all
I can to help keep debian-ha alive and our cluster stack in pristine
condition.

I've been communicating with upstream (beekhof, krig, feist), have
contributed to upstream as well -> and have gotten the hang of the
Pacemaker/Corosync stack utilizing crmsh or pcs/pcsd (pcs/pcsd is my
personal favorite cli tool).

I honestly didn't see a crmsh package so I started there - so very sorry
for how aggressive that ended up looking (I retracted ITP there ofc) :\ 

---

I'll take some time digging around Alioth, Package Tracker, and
reviewing any docs/links you guys provide for contributing.

---

I mentioned keeping corosync related libraries within the corosync
package - but Feri made a good point by stating we should ask why you
decided to break them up; since you likely had a good reason. What's
your take on this? 

---

http://mentors.debian.net/package/crmsh

That's what I've done with crmsh. Notice what I did with the rules file
(rather than patching the source). I had contributed a hack upstream for
making upstream source build work on Debian as well. 

I'll take a look through the existing package -> to see how you tackled
certain aspects. I'm sure also that depends needs to be updated. I can
just apply updated source to the old package and bring it up to date
with modifications - or is a properly built and tested new package able
to be dropped 'on-top'?

I rushed it a little bit so krig could look into potentially auto
generating debs for the public via OBS -> though the Build-Depends
caused him errors testing that out with OBS (SUSE build system).

pcs/pcsd is also an interesting subject, due to the ruby gem
installation for pcsd.  I've been working on the init script (which
upstreams provided version doesn't seem to work on Debian), but have
tackled a majority of that package already as well.

---

Feri, I recall you saying you would like to work on updating corosync ->
I can target pacemaker or pcs next, or we can work together on each
piece?  What would you prefer?

Are there any others still active?  Looking forward to meeting any of
you and working together in the future!

---

Alright, sorry for the massive brain picking. I'm rather excited now -
I'll get moving :)


Best,


-- 
Rik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: