Your message dated Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:57:49 -0400 with message-id <1427335069.3502.65.camel@mmogp.com> and subject line Retracting ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #781173, regarding ITP: crmsh -- Command-line interface for High-Availability cluster management on GNU/Linux systems to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 781173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781173 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: ITP: crmsh -- Command-line interface for High-Availability cluster management on GNU/Linux systems
- From: Richard B Winters <rik@mmogp.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:36:41 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20150325163641.16507.34759.reportbug@devrikx.mmod.com>
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Richard B Winters <rik@mmogp.com> * Package name : crmsh Version : 2.2.0~rc2+git.115.g0e24f25 Upstream Author : Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>, Kristoffer Gronlund <kgronlund@suse.com> * URL : https://github.com/ClusterLabs/crmsh * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: Python Description : CLI for HA cluster management Command-line interface for High-Availability cluster management on GNU/Linux systems crmsh is one of several command-line interfaces for managing the pacemaker/corosync High-Availability cluster stack. It was at one time bundled with cman, but as cman is no longer used or supported in the modern stack; crmsh needs its own package. RHEL only used cman until corosync was able to handle quorum on its own. In Debian, crmsh is bundled with cman. Both are considered out-of-date. I've authored changes upstream, and plan to keep in close contact with the upstream team. I intend to maintain this package via sponsorship - unless debian-ha would like to sponsor the package and allow me to join the team. If debian-ha is inactive, though, I'd like to get it going again. It will be uploaded to mentors.debian.org if nothing else, and awaiting sponsorship.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 781173-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Retracting ITP
- From: Richard B Winters <rik@mmogp.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:57:49 -0400
- Message-id: <1427335069.3502.65.camel@mmogp.com>
Hello, I did not intend to submit an ITP with the same package already existing in the repository (unstable). I used BugReport, and checked wnpp, as well as apt-cache policy, and I promise I did not get crmsh listed at all. Paul Wise explained to me the error (searching wnpp, my bug was the only bug filed there), and BugReport I did not use a filter. I still do not understand why apt-cache policy didn't pick it up, but regardless I wish to apologize, and to the maintainers; I offer my help :) Best, -- RikAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---