Bug#780155: ITP: baculum -- Baculum WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program
Hello,
I am working on Debian meta files for Baculum. As I said, I let know
about current progress.
Today I built new packages from git snapshot. My current changes are here:
https://launchpad.net/~ganiuszka/+archive/ubuntu/baculum/+packages
I am moving forward, but I guess that there is still something to do.
Please let me know if are needed some additional information about Baculum.
Best regards.
Marcin Haba
On 13.03.2015 04:10, Marcin Haba wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on adjusting Baculum files to Debian requirements.
>
> I am preparing project for Debian Jessie. Here you can see current state
> of sources:
>
> https://launchpad.net/~ganiuszka/+archive/ubuntu/baculum/+files/baculum_7.0%2Bgit20150208ppa1~jessie1.tar.xz
>
> On Jessie environment I have following warnings from Lintian (with my
> comments):
>
> W: baculum source: package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depends 9
>
> I need to read more about this dependency.
>
> W: baculum: extra-license-file
> usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/3rdParty/FirePHPCore/LICENSE
> W: baculum: extra-license-file
> usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/3rdParty/Markdown/License.text
> W: baculum: extra-license-file
> usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/3rdParty/Parsedown/LICENSE.txt
> W: baculum: extra-license-file
> usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/3rdParty/ReCaptcha/LICENSE
> W: baculum: extra-license-file
> usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/3rdParty/SafeHtml/license.txt
> W: baculum: extra-license-file
> usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/3rdParty/TinyMCE/license.txt
> W: baculum: extra-license-file
> usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/I18N/core/data/license.txt
>
> All files from directory /framework/ are PRADO Framework files. I would
> avoid a lot of framework modifications if they are not really needed. In
> reasonable cases I am able to change something in framework and add
> patch(es). I this case they are licenses files, trivial issue, I think.
>
> As I wrote previous, I have never added new packages to distribution. I
> rely on your opinions and advises.
>
> W: baculum: embedded-javascript-library
> usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/Web/Javascripts/source/prototype-1.7/prototype.js
> please use libjs-prototype
>
> PRADO Framework contains integrated Prototype.js library. It could be a
> bit painful change, because of nested integration Prototype.js with
> framework, but I am able to change it.
>
> W: baculum: embedded-javascript-library
> usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/Web/Javascripts/source/scriptaculous-1.9.0/scriptaculous.js
> please use libjs-scriptaculous
>
> The same thing like with Prototype.js, Scriptaculous.js is internal tool
> from framework. Possible to change.
>
> W: baculum: extra-license-file
> usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/Web/Javascripts/source/tinymce-405/license.txt
>
> Next license file. TinyMCE Editor from framework is not used at all by
> Baculum. All TinyMCE implementation as module to framework could be removed.
>
> W: baculum: embedded-javascript-library
> usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/Web/Javascripts/source/tinymce-405/plugins/compat3x/tiny_mce_popup.js
> please use tinymce2?
>
> To remove as above.
>
> W: baculum: duplicate-font-file
> usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/Web/UI/WebControls/assets/verase.ttf
> also in ttf-bitstream-vera
>
> Next framework element - TrueType font.
> =====
>
> That are all warnings that Lintian shown.
>
> From other things, I moved location of Baculum scripts from /var/www to
> /usr/share/baculum/htdocs/, because Lintian indicated me that it is not
> good choice.
>
> BTW: I noticed that Lintian from Jessie is more restrictive than that
> from Ubuntu.
>
> I will back when I have something new.
>
> Best regards.
> Marcin Haba
>
Reply to: