On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 02:43:21AM +0000, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: > On 26/02/15 1:37 PM, "Miguel Landaeta" <nomadium@debian.org> wrote: > > >I think there was a confusion in this bug report since jffi != jnr-ffi. > > > >jffi, already in the archive, needs an update to be useful with jruby > >and jnr-ffi needs to be packaged since is a critical dependency of jruby > >as well. > > Right - yeah I messed up filing this bug a bit since I thought jffi and > jnr-ffi were the same thing. We can close it since no new packages are > being created. Nope, you were right about opening this bug report. You should close it when jnr-ffi 2.0.x gets accepted in the archive. The update of jffi must be handled in another bug report: #776082. -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key. "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature