Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library

[PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>]

Hello, here a quick review of all the patches

* dropped docs package (REJECT-FAQ: split this only if it's big)
  I think that this patch should be reverted.
  The problem if you add the documentation in python-scoop seems to me problematic when python3-scoop will come.
  It is best to my opinion especially for the python pacakging to put the documentation nto a dedicated package which can be recommended by python2 and python3.
  I do not think that this -doc package would be rejected by ftp-master. There argument is understandable when you have only one binary pacakge.
But here we can intall python2 and/or python3 version but in both cases you want the documentation.


* finalized
  ok, do not hesitate to use cme to fix your control file.

* changelog: restored 'initial release' and added info on previous package

  is there common binary packages between this old scoop package and the new one ?

* build docs package
  ok

* running testsuite
  nice to have a test suite. You can look at the debci and autopkgtest infrastructure to implement also the integration continuous integration for scoop.

* changelog: improved package info
* copyright: indent correction

ok

* control: corrected dependency, copyright: shortened too long line

why did you removed the virtual package ssh-client ?

* added no-adsense.patch
  could you discuss with the upstream to remove these privacy breach things.
  If they really want them, it should be nice to have a setup.py flag which allow to get rid of these google analytic links, instead of carrying a dedicated patch all the time.

* updated some files in deb/, removed source/local-options and egg-info, added examples and doc-base

  You removed the local-options (are you using gbp-buildpackage to build scoop ?)

So I will consiede the pacakge ready for upload once

 1) you regenerate the -doc package (this will simplify thinks when python3 pacakge will be possible)
 2) re-add the ssh-client  dependency (cheap)
 3) add the autopkgtest part (will simplify a lot the maintenance of the package, so important for me)


I need to build it and do the copyright check.

then I think that it will be ok for me to sponsor the upload.

Cheers

Frederic