[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#746158: marked as done (RFH: csv2latex -- a CSV to LaTeX file converter)

Your message dated Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:35:05 -0400
with message-id <20140915123505.237156a3c56673b8dbab8859@lm7.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#746158: RFH: csv2latex -- a CSV to LaTeX file converter
has caused the Debian Bug report #746158,
regarding RFH: csv2latex -- a CSV to LaTeX file converter
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
746158: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746158
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I request assistance with maintaining the csv2latex package.

Due to insufficient rights for uploading csv2latex to
ftp-master i would like a kind mentor to review and
eventually upload csv2latex-0.18-3 (just a deb-related
fix, not upstream). I now maintain both upstream and
debian package on https://svn.gtmp.org/svn/csv2latex/
The dsc and tarballs are temporarly available at:
http://brouits.free.fr/tmp/csv2latex/

Thanks.
Benoît

The package description is:
 csv2latex is a simple command-line file converter
 that converts a comma-separated-values file into
 a LaTeX table. It can guess exotic csv formats.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:36:37 +0200, ben <brouits@free.fr> wrote:
> Le 15/09/2014 05:44, Matteo Cypriani a écrit :
> > Hi there,
> >
> > It seems that csv2latex version 0.18.1 has been uploaded, shouldn't this
> > bug be closed?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >    Matteo
> >
> > P.S.: I emailed Benoît in private to offer my help but didn't receive any
> > answer, maybe my message was marked as spam?
> >
> 
> Yes, indeed it must be closed. Sorry for my late reply.

Let's close it then.

Attachment: pgpeLl7oZs_rh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: