[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#736652: marked as done (ITP: compress-lzf -- basic LZF codec, compatible with standard C LZF package)

Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:00:06 +0000
with message-id <E1XJPLq-0008BU-P4@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#736652: fixed in compress-lzf 1.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #736652,
regarding ITP: compress-lzf -- basic LZF codec, compatible with standard C LZF package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
736652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Control: block 660826 by -1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : compress-lzf
  Version         : 0.9.6
  Upstream Author : Tatu Saloranta <tatu.saloranta@iki.fi>
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/ning/compress/wiki
* License         : Apache 2.0
  Description     : Basic LZF codec, compatible with standard C LZF package

compress-lzf is a build-dependency for Elasticsearch.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: compress-lzf
Source-Version: 1.0.1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
compress-lzf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 736652@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org> (supplier of updated compress-lzf package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 18:00:32 +0200
Source: compress-lzf
Binary: libcompress-lzf-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>
Changed-By: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>
Description:
 libcompress-lzf-java - Ning-compress-LZF
Closes: 736652
Changes:
 compress-lzf (1.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #736652)
Checksums-Sha1:
 8be19006768172fd53cd857d6289589d372a1eb8 1256 compress-lzf_1.0.1-1.dsc
 c50672c45356c93ba483ca8ec3a289e0cc664f96 2387305 compress-lzf_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 03ae3539645ca0358662e8e6fd1ce3dd25f4013c 2392 compress-lzf_1.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 3c7f173f7395a4c00657ad6bb59367aa01191151 75140 libcompress-lzf-java_1.0.1-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 fc5228639228b0d1c63b2b33967748c7f14c46cd492475ac0189b4112b98fcc3 1256 compress-lzf_1.0.1-1.dsc
 ecaf9b2ca65cb9db241edf992be71ce520fe294cc1ca217d084c5ef8c6748ff6 2387305 compress-lzf_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 e63e80ce2ab46e9952046f42fdc3f6072c56e011a4af8dfede9ce0ab4e2c3c23 2392 compress-lzf_1.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 58668a34724e14048e5dcd003bcd34f43cdd3977eb4000900ebf3e52becc1de8 75140 libcompress-lzf-java_1.0.1-1_all.deb
Files:
 05b6d5b71fb3ed1e523ca5bb6064ae3d 75140 java optional libcompress-lzf-java_1.0.1-1_all.deb
 45e22da8c0781ad4ea9daf79b2ff1630 1256 java optional compress-lzf_1.0.1-1.dsc
 be27ea919c11c4aca365efe0f1842f95 2387305 java optional compress-lzf_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 5bc43f1e7aaa2327114483a3b1a28a5d 2392 java optional compress-lzf_1.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlOUs6UACgkQUCgnLz/SlGiXKwCfTVEGFvEuznra1GO6uFAn2g3b
zlgAoNmmKpWpsw7c2P/gmm5gTGfWb2Z7
=p6G6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: