Bug#674882: Noowner libircclient
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 15.08.2014 14:01, Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
>>> Giving some thought into it, I have changed my mind, and I will
>>> not adopt this package - I will however make the changes
>>> recorded in the collab-maint repository mentioned above after
>>> the wheezy freeze as a QA upload if someone doesn't adopt the
>>> package before.
>>>
>>
>> I was wondering to adopt the package but I cannot find any
>> information why it is +dfsg, and what has been removed from the
>> source.
>>
>> Andreas, maybe you remember what violates dfsg in the source.
>> Licensecheck does not show anything.
>
> By the way, I don't know if you have seen it, but the work I did
> on packaging libircclient is still available in the git repos:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/libircclient.git;a=summary
>
> Feel free to use that, or delete it - I don't mind either way.
Yes I saw it, I intend to use it - thanks you. Anyway in the newest
version, the rfc file is not present so we can drop the +dfsg suffix.
- --
Dariusz Dwornikowski,
Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology
www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/
room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=QTVj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: