[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#683746: Review of debian/copyright for rspamd


On 08/08/14 22:14, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Hi,
> On 08.08.2014 15:07, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
>> On 08/08/14 00:42, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> I'm sorry to say, but bitbucket repository is absolutely outdated and
>> I've now closed it completely. The current repository is now on github:
>> https://github.com/vstakhov/rspamd
>> The debian/copyright file has been rewritten completely since bitbucket
>> version.
> Ah, I see. Fortunately the copyright situation didn't change much, so I
> merged my changes into the rewritten copyright file and reviewed the
> differences between the bitbucket and github repositories.
> This resulted in attached patch, which fixes minor issues, e.g. moving
> the general stanza to the beginning, adding some missing copyright
> holders, mentioning the files licensed under LGPL-2.1+ or in the public
> domain, correcting copyright years, changing license names to more
> standard ones (BSD-2-clause -> BSD-2-Clause, Apache 2.0 -> Apache-2.0),
> and removing the MIT license, which is actually a duplicate of the Expat
> license.

I've applied the suggested patch to both 0.6 and master branches. Thank
you for the contribution!

Vsevolod Stakhov

Reply to: